Rules explained · Updated Q1 2026

Static vs trailing drawdown: the rule that ends most accounts

More funded accounts are lost to a misunderstood drawdown rule than to bad trading. The difference between a static and a trailing maximum drawdown decides whether a normal pullback is fine or fatal. Here is exactly how each behaves, with worked numbers.

Affiliate disclosure. We may earn a commission when you sign up through some links on this page. This never changes our scoring or where a firm ranks. How this works.

What "drawdown" means here

In prop-firm terms, your maximum drawdown is the lowest your account is allowed to fall before you fail the evaluation or lose the funded account. It is the single most important risk rule you trade under. The crucial detail almost every new trader misses is that there are two completely different ways firms calculate it — static and trailing — and they behave very differently on a winning account.

Static drawdown: a fixed floor

A static maximum drawdown sets your loss floor once, based on your starting balance, and never moves it. It is the trader-friendly structure, and the firms we rank highest mostly use it.

Worked example — $100,000 account, 10% static drawdown

  • Starting balance: $100,000. Loss floor: fixed at $90,000.
  • You trade up to $115,000. Your floor stays at $90,000 — it does not move.
  • You have a bad week and fall back to $94,000. You are still fine: you are $4,000 above the floor.
  • The only way to breach is to actually fall to $90,000, no matter how high you climbed first.

Takeaway: with static drawdown, the profit you build becomes a genuine buffer. A winning run makes your account safer.

Trailing drawdown: a floor that chases you

A trailing maximum drawdown starts at the same place but rises as your account hits new equity highs, locking in a portion of your gains. It protects the firm, not you — and it turns a normal pullback into a breach far more easily.

Worked example — $100,000 account, 10% trailing drawdown

  • Starting balance: $100,000. Initial floor: $90,000.
  • You trade up to $115,000. The floor trails up to $103,500 (10% below your new peak).
  • You fall back to $94,000 — the exact same pullback that was completely safe under static rules.
  • You have now breached. $94,000 is below your trailed floor of $103,500. The account is gone.

Takeaway: with trailing drawdown, the same trade that was fine under a static floor ends your account. Your profit worked against you.

Why this rule ends so many accounts

The trap is psychological as much as technical. A trader builds a healthy profit, feels safe, and trades normally — only to discover that the trailing floor has crept up beneath them and a routine retracement has breached it. They were never actually as safe as the balance suggested. This is why we weight drawdown type heavily in our scoring, and why we flag it prominently on every review.

A few important nuances

  • Balance vs equity trailing. Some trailing rules follow your closed-trade balance; stricter ones follow your peak equity, including unrealised profit on open trades. Equity-based trailing is the harshest version — your floor can rise intraday on a trade you haven't even closed yet.
  • Trailing often stops at breakeven. On many firms the trailing floor stops rising once it reaches your initial balance, so after enough profit the rule effectively converts to static. Check where, and whether, the trail locks.
  • "10%" is not "10%". Two firms can both advertise a 10% maximum drawdown and offer completely different risk depending on whether it is static or trailing. The percentage tells you almost nothing on its own.

Which firms use which

Among the firms we rank, the highest-placed ones — TraderScale, FTMO, The5ers and City Traders Imperium — predominantly use static drawdown, which is part of why they rank where they do. Several others, including FundedNext and Funding Pips, use mixed structures that vary by program, so you must confirm the type for the specific account you buy. Always check the rulebook, not the landing page.

Compare before you commit

Check current pricing and challenge rules on the firm's own site, then compare against our #1 pick before you buy.

FAQ

Common questions

What is the difference between static and trailing drawdown?
A static maximum drawdown sets your loss floor once and never moves it. A trailing drawdown rises as your account hits new equity highs, locking in a portion of your gains — which makes a normal pullback far more likely to breach your account.
Is static or trailing drawdown better for traders?
Static drawdown is more trader-friendly, because the profit you build becomes a genuine buffer. With trailing drawdown, a winning run can actually make your account easier to breach. The highest-ranked firms mostly use static drawdown.
Which prop firms use static drawdown?
Among the firms we rank, TraderScale, FTMO, The5ers and City Traders Imperium predominantly use static drawdown. Several others use mixed structures that vary by program, so always confirm the type for your specific account.
What is equity-based trailing drawdown?
The harshest version of trailing drawdown, where your floor follows your peak equity including unrealised profit on open trades — so your floor can rise intraday on a position you haven't even closed yet.

Our #1 prop firm for 2026

TraderScale tops our scorecard on rule transparency, US accessibility and payout clarity.

Read the TraderScale review Compare all 10 firms